Oct 08
Didn’t have my wits about me, Your Honour. Can’t remember where I left them
Topic is Advertising, Broadcasting, Consumer, Education, Food and drink, Health, Media, Politics, Society, television by Brian Mackie | Print it |Are you fat? Are you morbid? Or are you morbidly fat? If you’re both, congratulations! It’s not your fault. The new message to fatsos is:
It’s not you. It’s your metabolism.

We no longer have the guts to take personal responsibility. Picture from Dreamstime.com
This slogan is just another escalation of the creeping “no blame” culture that afflicts us. No fault can ever apply to you. Instead, fault always rests with other people (or things) over which you – as a victim – naturally have no control.
So if, like boxer David Tua, you block out the daylight and knock out anyone in your way, and then shuffle off to Burger King for an interview with a fawning TV idiot, it’s not your fault for being a dull pugilist who didn’t know when to stop punching the living daylights out of the opponent. It’s because God cruelly deprived you of intelligence and cursed you with an uncontrollable metabolism.

Your Honour, I had this accident while waving to someone I ran over last week. Picture from Dreamstime.com
If you are a minister helping yourself to expenses, it’s not you. It’s your trust, and it’s the rules. If you are a former minister found guilty of (and jailed for) bribery, corruption and perverting the course of justice, it’s not you. It’s koha, it’s your cultural entitlement, it’s the system. It’s not you.
If you get drunk and kill someone on the roads, it’s not you. It’s either the alcohol, or your metabolism, or the vehicle, and it’s the victim’s fault for getting in your way.
If the gun went off and somebody died, it’s not you. It’s the gun. There must have been something wrong with it, or the people who made it or sold it, or the police who gave you a firearms licence (or didn’t check you out).
You didn’t really kill that child. It was your fists, acting independently during some brief seconds when, without your consent, they were disconnected from your brain. It’s because you were deprived. Or underpaid. Or ill-educated. Or something else. It wasn’t you.
Lost someone in an adventure tourism trip? It wasn’t you. It was an accident, and in these enlightened times, we don’t accept the concept of an accident. We want closure, and someone must be blamed. It’s not you.
Dying of lung cancer? It’s not you. It’s that irresponsible, random carcinoma. Don’t worry. We’ll catch it some day…
Unable to read and write? It’s not you. It’s just too hard. Unable to teach? It’s not you. It’s the parents. Unable to control your kids? It’s not you. It’s the teachers.
Lost all your money to a finance company? It’s not you. It’s the Government or the financial adviser. Actually, almost everything that goes wrong is not you. It’s the Government.
And of course, it’s the Government that so desperately tries to avoid any trouble, by promoting the no-blame culture and trying to con everybody into paying for everybody’s else’s mistakes.
Question: If you swallow all this “it’s not you” rot, what are you?
Answer: A robot.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Tagged as David Tua, No-fault, Paraparaumu Airport, SureSlim Wellness Clinic, TV One
Tagged as David Tua, No-fault, Paraparaumu Airport, SureSlim Wellness Clinic, TV One


October 8th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
I have lately learned that organisers of Scout or Guide camps and such-like must now complete a Risk Assessment Memorandum (or some such title) for every activity the kids may be taken on. These activities apparently include life-threatening movements such as the use of a potato peeler. What possible risk does the child face when using a potato peeler, apart from losing a bit of skin? What could be the consequences? What provisions must we have in place to deal with such hazards?
The purpose of the form, of course, has nothing to do with child safety. It has everything to do with blaming someone else, apart from the person who constructed the form, and the person who lost a bit of skin. And the Chinese person who made the potato peeler.
Should I be seriously confronted by such a form, I warn the author: There is a risk that, when the Scouts and I track you down, we will stuff this document right up your lazy, good-for-nothing bottom, along with the phone-book-thick book of rules that justifies your safe position. That should make you sit up straight, for a change.
October 9th, 2009 at 10:28 am
I blame the ACC legislation for the “blame free” society, and also for the pressure they exert in groups like scouts and schools, to have RAMs (Risk Assessment Management) for every possible activity. There have been at least two generations that have grown up with the ACC “no fault” legislation – many of our current politicians are among them. ACC should be able to put in a claim at court hearings to recover costs they have incurred for “accidents” when someone is found guilty of dangerous driving causing death or injury. This should also be done in professional hearings such as medical “misadventure”, to make people aware of their involvement in an incident. If they had to repay ACC for the rest of their lives, and any estate was taken as well to cover the ACC costs, we may not have the awful driving statistics, etc that we do have. If you are found guilty of negligence you should have to pay!