The Islanders Report is as clumsy as a heavy horse…
Topic is Education, Law and order, Media, Politics, Society by Brian Mackie | Print it |On the other hand, GoG’s new research is irrefutable. Taking Dr Greg Clydesdale’s report on Pacific Islanders in New Zealand, which is part of a three-year study called “Growing Pains, Evaluations and the Cost of Human Capital” and headlined in the DomPost, our internationally acclaimed researchers made two key initial findings:
- The three-year study’s title is baffling and meaningless and
- Clydesdale’s report, as described by the DomPost, is virtually worthless
Then our scrutineers delved deeper into the Doc’s reported findings, which will be presented at an international conference in Brazil, where nuts are an important industry and where Clydesdale’s shock revelations will hopefully be left to moulder, creating useful compost.
Before presenting our expert team’s findings, let’s summarise the Dominion Post’s article about the Clydesdale report. It says that Polynesians pose a threat to New Zealand economic growth because there are too many of them; they are too fertile and therefore breed lots of new Pacific Islanders; they are useless in school; they do not start enough new businesses; they are not sufficiently productive (except between the sheets); and they are over-represented in crime statistics.
Taking Dr Clydesdale’s basic statistics, we discovered that 93.1 percent of New Zealand’s 3,854,695 population (measured in 2007) are not Polynesian. We know that 265,974 (6.9 percent) are. Of these, only 9100 Pacific Islanders (or 8 percent) were convicted of an offence in 2006 – ranging from littering the streets to perhaps the odd murder. Who knows? Clydesdale makes the remarkable claim that this number (1.1 percent more than Islanders’ proportion of the total population) makes them over-represented in crime figures.
Our research found that Dr Clydesdale had not researched the typical offences committed by Pacific Islanders by age group or socio-economic category, but by taking a Clydesdale-clod-hopping shot in the dark, we concluded they mostly consisted of petty crimes of theft and violence caused by ignorance, poverty and deprivation – although it must be stressed that this is pure conjecture (rather like much of Dr Clydesdale’s conclusions).
We learned that, overall, Pacific Islanders convicted during the study period made up 0.23 percent of the entire population. This means that 99.77 percent of the other people in this country are either offenders, or innocent, or a substantial proportion of some other group unconnected with Pacific Islanders must be committing most of the crime as well as (like those hopeless Polynesians) failing to come up with the software solutions that could bring untold riches to our shores. Who could that group consist of, we wondered?
The preliminary answer is that, in 2004 for example, a staggering 43 percent of criminal convictions were earned by the minority Maori population which in 2006 was measured at 565,326 – more than double the population of Pacific Islanders who couldn’t come close in criminal terms, with Islanders accounting for 9 percent and 45 percent by NZ Europeans, who overwhelmingly outnumber both of the other ethnic groups.
Our team looked in vain at the Dominion Post’s report for an answer to these pressing issues. All we found of interest was Clydesdale’s claim that all these Pacific Island under-achievers would produce “a large proportion of the population without the educational requirements to create [new products and production processes].”
Independently, we found that much of young Pacific Islanders’ poor academic performance can be attributed to a low starting base. Their immigrant parents tend to gather in urban groups for support and, lacking skills, tend also to do the dirty jobs that white high achievers gave up long ago. The children also – like white children – have trouble in becoming bi-lingual and therefore lag behind.
It is possible (nay, quite likely) that the Dominion Post omitted some important details that could justify Clydesdale’s findings. If not, our team recommends that the Massey boffin’s research be placed in a dustbin that might well be emptied by a poorly paid Pacific Islander, along with the fish and chip wrappings that were yesterday’s newspaper.
Tagged as crime, dominion_post, Dr_Greg_Clydesdale, economic_development, Pacific_Islanders, Polynesians



May 24th, 2008 at 4:48 pm
“Independently, we found that much of young Pacific Islanders’ poor academic performance can be attributed to a low starting base.”
What about Indians and Asians though who have also come from a low starting base in many cases? In the case of Asians, they actually outperform Europeans on average which correlates to their higher, on average, performance on IQ tests. http://www.slate.com/id/2178122/entry/2178123/
Certainly a low starting position is one factor, but what about culture? It’s been pretty well documented that LA ‘gangsta’ culture is pretty popular amongst polynesian youth. How much of a factor is this, with its glamorisation of a violent, macho lifestyle?
May 26th, 2008 at 9:51 pm
Good point, Bob. The difference here is that Asians outperform everyone because they are genetically, socially and often religiously hard-wired to succeed. This may be to do with too many people competing for too little space in easily invaded territory. What we can see is that this impetus to succeed is handed down from generation to generation. If the initial generation doesn’t have the impetus, you end up with Maori and Pacific Island values being handed down. The issue is: either these ethnic groups sign up to Asian or European values, encouraged by the majority population, or we generate our own unique underclass.
June 11th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
Hiya, Just wanted to say whoever wrote the article here - good form! It’s great, I love it. Very witty and funny. It’s so nice to see people can see beyond what they are told.
Here is a website of critique on Dr Clydesdale’s report:
http://www.minpac.govt.nz/PaulCallister.pdf.
Thanks again.
June 19th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
I’m a 25 yr old Samoan born and bred in NZ. I am the eldest of five children. I recently completed my studies and I am currently working as a Solicitor at one of NZ’s top firms. The 2nd eldest is in his last years at Med School. The 3rd is also at Uni, with the fourth in her last year at high school with ambitions of doing engineering next year. The youngest is still at primary school. My parents worked extremely hard to give us the opportunities my siblings and I have today. My mother never stopped working since she left school, with the majority of her working life holding down two jobs. She now runs her own business. My father has worked many jobs to put food on the table, such as a factory hand, a panel beater, a taxi driver, and a social worker.
What sort of work ethic do you call that? We’ve never copied Asian/European values. These are the Pacific Island Christian working class values my grandparents brought over from Samoa back in the 60s.
Even in Asian and European migrants, there are variations. Cambodians and Vietnamese are not as financially stable as the middle class Chinese, Taiwanese or Korean migrants. Cambodians and Vietnamese have similar education results as Pacific peoples. Eastern European migrants also have a slower start. But studies show that over time, migrants and their offspring improve in socio-economic statistics. Something Clydesdale failed to do in his study by comparing his outdated 2001 data with recent 2006 census statistics!
June 29th, 2008 at 3:47 pm
I agree wholeheartedly with Doctor Clydesdale, in spite of the media beat-up. It’s about time someone stood up and said it. I read the paper every day and dark-skinned inhabitants feature heavily in the crime stories, poor-achieving stories and hand-out stories. This is a factor which is sinking MY country - and I don’t like it. The white kiwi male is gullible enough to believe the sob stories of dark-skinned inhabitants and pamper to their extortion rackets - why should my hard-earned tax money go to these slugs with their sloth culture?
July 1st, 2008 at 3:20 pm
John T, I was born here. I’ve never been on any benefit. I pay my taxes. I’ve never broken a single law. Perhaps you should stop whining and get over yourself. Wake up and smell the coffee. It’s an exciting multi-cultural world out there, if you care to join it!