Free groceries, at your local DHB store!
Topic is Consumer, Health, Society, Your money by Brian Mackie | Print it |Mums leaving Wellington Hospital within six hours of producing could have earned a $100 grocery voucher – until Capital and Coast District Health Board, accused of being off its trolley and trying to bribe patients, went into rapid reverse and scrapped the idea.
It would have brought a whole new meaning to the term “check-out”.
But there’s tremendous scope for extending this concept to cover all sorts of ailments and injuries – and slash waiting lists.
Why should there even be the need for many people to enter hospital, let alone leave it, if we can bribe them to remain at home, just ill enough, without actually dying?
We could incentivise them to “pick up thy bed, and walk” by offering shopping vouchers in ascending values according to how sick they are – rather like the way ACC values a lost leg at, say, $10,000, but a missing pinky earns $10, including GST.
How about starting with $100 in food or holiday vouchers (with Fly Bye-Byes, of course) for every week someone needing a hernia operation elects to stay on the waiting list? It’s a lot cheaper than the $1500-odd it costs us to keep them in hospital for a night. And it would speed things up for the rest of the lame and infirm who already have enough food, or have just come back from holiday.
Properly handled, the revolutionary new GoG scheme could not only cut patient queues. It might even allow us to create hospital redundancies.
And it could benefit the humble GP.
Every surgery has its semi-resident hypochondriac or three. Some are almost professionally “sick”, keeping logbooks of their imaginary illnesses – rather like train-spotters – along with entire libraries of medical dictionaries, often marked up with diseases personally suffered.
But most of them are merely sad and lonely, and regularly turn up at the doctor’s just for a chat and a moan. For this, they’re usually rewarded with some harmless placebo or other, which does the trick until next Monday morning.
Why not, instead, save State funds on useless medicines and offer them a $25 voucher for a herbal remedy of their choice, just for turning up but not seeing the doc? Waiting times would be dramatically reduced and homeopathic health shop-owners would be ecstatic.
We could extend the idea to other well-being promotions, such as discounted sensible shoes from the chiropodist, or fruit, veg and toothpaste coupons from the dentist, cheap binoculars from the optician… the opportunities are endless.
This idea has legs! It might become so popular that District Health Boards could end up going into supermarket retailing, along with cheap petrol and public transport ticket sales. They could have a fancy slogan, such as “Everything we do, we do to save ourselves hassle.”
There’s only one potential drawback: if it really catches on, the healthy rest of us, seeing all this largesse being spread throughout the unhealthy, may begin to feel a little sick…
Tagged as Consumer, DHB, grocery_voucher, Health, patient_queues, Society, waiting_list, waiting_lists, wellington_hospital, Your money


December 4th, 2007 at 3:14 pm
But now it gets serious.
A first time mother is sent home from Wellington Hospital five hours after enduring between 20 and 30 hours of labour and an episiotomy (that’s a surgical operation).
This was far from a natural birth. The baby dies the next day, and then Capital and Coast DHB puts all the blame on a midwife (ignoring the roles played by its own medical staff in this tragedy).
Capital and Coast is a dysfunctional organisation that should be immediately shut down and taken over by the Ministry of Health.
Come on, David Cunliffe – as you said: “I’m running the show”.
But the chances of swift action are slim, because MPs are too busy debating the final passage of a bill that will protect their own narrow interests by restricting free speech during election campaigns.
Unless Cunliffe acts to dismiss the DHB, we’ll be left thinking that they couldn’t give a toss about your health, let alone your freedom.
December 9th, 2007 at 10:47 pm
Sending a newborn home before they were even sure it was able to “latch on” to its mother – the news reports said attempts after they got home failed – should be treated as criminal neglect. There’s every chance an infant could starve in those circumstances, surely.